Posted on October 10, 2021
Note that non-competitors may also conflict with unqualified compensation plans. This subject is terribly complex, but the sentences imposed on the wrong person are high. If it is found that a non-competition clause bound by a deferral agreement is contrary to IRC Section 409A, the penalty amounts to an additional tax of 20%, plus a significant interest penalty. The IRS`s position is that severance pay subject to a non-compete clause may be contrary to Section 409A if there is a theoretical possibility for the employee to influence the year in which the payment is made. If payment is made during the execution of such an agreement in the context of the sale of an activity or business, the amount paid for the agreement may constitute compensatory income for the return of future income (Proulx, 594 F.2d 832 (Ct. Cl. 1979); Gazette Telegraph Co., 209 F.2d 926 (10th Cir. 1954), aff`g 19 T.C. 692 (1953); Estate of Beals, 82 F.2d 268 (2d Cir. 1936), aff`g 31 B.T.A.
966 (1934)). However, where the agreement is executed between an employee`s owner and a buyer and is primarily a means for the purchaser of good business or goodwill to ensure the ability to recover the value of the good acquired, the execution of the agreement constitutes the creation of capital that is not to be distinguished from good business or goodwill (Michaels, 12 T.C 17 (1949); Toledo Newspaper Co., 2 T.C 794 (1943), acq. 1944 C.B 28). > withholding tax (WHT): When a payment is made to an employee, the payer must withhold payroll tax. If the payment of non-competition fees generates commercial revenue for the beneficiary, the payer is subject to the 10% withholding tax under the heading “Professional and Technical Services Fees” To create non-competition rules, get the services of a lawyer who designed and tried them in the jurisdiction and who knows how the courts are addressing the related issues. The fiscal capacity of non-compete taxes depends largely on the terms of the agreement. For example, if the transaction document for the transfer of shares/companies does not provide for a specific consideration for non-compete costs, the taxpayer may try to tax the entire consideration (including non-compete fees) as a capital gain. This treatment may offer the taxable person a possibility of tax arbitration, since this element would be taxed at 20% (if it is long-term) instead of 30%. However, this carries a risk of litigation, since the tax authorities may attempt to determine part of the counter-performance from the sale of these non-compete taxes and to levy higher taxes by changing the nature of this amount as commercial and professional income.
. . .